| « previous | blog | next » |
August 22, 2008
Year in and year out an unimaginable number of photographs are produced worldwide. Virtually every day each of us enlarges this gigantic mountain of photographs, without giving the consequences a second thought. But while photography seems a harmless leisure pursuit, the chemicals contained in all photographs pose enormous dangers to our health. What‘s more, photographs in such quantities increase visual pollution and undermine our thinking power—to say nothing of the moral dangers they pose for our children.
In these conditions it would be best if we stopped making photographs altogether—but in many cases this is hardly possible. Therefore, it is essential to professionally dispose of all photographs once they are no longer needed. Experts from East and West have warned us for decades about the impending, catastrophic consequences of the photo boom, but their pleas have fallen on deaf ears among those responsible in industry and politics. Today billions of used photographs are stored improperly in homes and businesses, waiting for desparately needed recycling facilities.
The Institute for the Reprocessing of Used Photographs, privately founded in 1990, offers a clear path out of this seemingly inescapable situation. The Institute maintains all facilities necessary to professionally reprocess photos of all kinds—or, in hopeless cases, dispose of them ecologically. We collect used, abandoned and unfashionable photographs in black and white or color, including instant photographs, photobooth strips, entire photo albums, contact sheets, test strips, negatives and slides, as well as damaged and shredded items, in both small and large quantities.
Remember, used photographs do not belong in the household garbage—they need special disposal. Many photographs can serve a new and useful purpose after reprocessing. For the sake of our environment, send your used photographs to the Institute for the Reprocessing of Used Photographs.
Participation in this recycling program is guaranteed free of charge!
--Translated text of an official notice published in Germany in 1990 by conceptual artist, visual sociologist, and prankster Joachim Schmid. Listen to a great exclusive audio interview with Schmid recorded this year for Lens Culture.
Pardon me, but I see it ass backwards. In the film days, a processed image had a lifetime of about a hundred years. Now, the digital image has a lifetime equal to the life span of an average hard drive. Perhaps you heard that Robert Capa's long lost negatives have been found, in Mexico. You think someone will dig through some cast off hard drives to find gems, say fifty years from today? Even if they do save the drives, what are their chances of being able to get fifty year old technology to communicate with their current one? Got a computer that reads punch cards? Anyone?
This initially struck me as an issue that is somewhat over-looked, or perhaps more accurately, one that I never fully thought about to the fullest extent. In any regard, it does present a solution of sorts to our worldwide photographic addiction.
I've often thought that a great benefit of consumers moving to digital photography is that, compared to film, it's quite Green. You would think that galleries would embrace digital photography for this reason alone - being the progressives that they usually are.