Not a Zoo

It's all about implication and empathy or distance and impartiality as a rule. A possible question about if a photograph should include life with all its ingredients or it should be just a thin image for our friend's curiosity. The photograph is just a piece of paper or a piece of life imprinted for immortality? It's a dead body or a living thing with fluids and its own thoughts. It's all about the colors and the shapes or there are things to read or things to feel. And what if in the meantime your subject decides to turn and shout at you ''What about my cels, my thoughts, my feelings or my choices? I’m shapes, I’m colors, I’m smiles and I am tears but my life is greater! This should be more than all of this! This is my reality, this is not a zoo! A photo project in which I am trying to answer the question ''how much are we capable to include in a photograph?'' or a non-mathematical calculation of the maximum volume of the photography medium.