now it wouldn’t be NOW

●the landscape is the trace of the landscape 2-2 When we face to what we don’t want to forget, we take a photograph. But not always we get capturing that in the photograph. Between the landscape in the photography and the landscape what we remember, there is the distance what isn’t able to repair. The photograph doesn’t reaches the moment NOW, never can catch it. Because the moment that we hoped record is prior to the moment in that we took the photograph. The time passes continually, passing the time is disappearing and losing. We cannot escape from this system. In this system, everything appears end later disappears. In the photographic image I see only the trace of the existence, the absence of the object. But even though we only capture the trace of what we really wanted to capture, we love the photograph. As the photograph isn’t perfect, our memory tries to recover this something. I believe that it’s posible to recover it because what we want to recover is what already we have had. We cannot avoid the fact that this object disappeared at the same time we cannot avoid the fact that this object really existed. Thanks for the photograph as trace of the time, we can believe what something existed. now it wouldn’t be NOW If in the privies series I tried ti capture the memory of the landscape where I had lived, in this series I tried to capture the landscape without memory. I traveled for long time without any destination or goal to many places. I had known that in none I would stay forever. I had known that I would miss the landscape that I was looking in the near future. I wanted to save what I was looking in the photo, but it’s imposible. In the photo, it shows only the trace of the time long lost and cherished.