I didn't have the faintest idea of how one would approach a portrait. In the past, I felt that my few attempts caused more disruption both for the subject and myself, feeling that I didn't know how to get out of the way. In recent years I developed what has been recognized as a not so orthodox approach to the depiction of the architectural. This was inspired by what I'd consider a curious internal conversation ruminating about the complex process of architecture; an endeavor of purpose that supposedly informs an intended built realization. It has resulted with my producing of non traditional vantages, positioning, framing, and undermined grounding of the built somewhere between recognized documentation and playful abstracting but not quite either. Maybe between or just outside both's consideration, not sure. This approach has allowed me to imagine myself being watched as i point the camera, thus not limited to looking-at via the camera. The current selection of portraits convey for me a sense of "ungrounding", causing my questioning of whether I reside between or just outside, undermining my sense of place beyond spatial concerns. Maybe, the architectural is not 'out there'?